Essay about Othello Iagos Soliloquies and Intentions

Iago’s Soliloquies and Intentions In every play there is at least one character that jumps of the page and begs for your attention. In The Tragedy of Othello by William Shakespeare this character is Iago. Iago is a devious man, liar, manipulator, and psychopath. It seems as though in the world of Shakespeare there is always consent power struggles throughout almost all his plays (list several examples) However, to me the most interesting of all of these, is in the play Othello. Where Iago seeks revenge on an unknowing Othello. Iago Othello’s trusted ensign betrays him in the most deceitful ways. One would conclude that Iago would have motive behind his ruthless and elaborate plans. My theory is that Iago had committed these moral†¦show more content†¦He uses his language and he self-awareness to create a false perception of himself, one he wishes others to believe. Othello often takes Iago’s words with great face, often referring to him as loyal and honest. It is Othello who is the fooled by th is perception pronouncing him â€Å" Honest Iago†. Iago seems to know how he should act in society, what the proper rules and protocols are however he disobeys them without hesitation. He has a wife Emilia, and although to me it seems that he doesn’t care for her why does he keep her around, perhaps to blend in with the others, as to not drawl attention to himself. In Iago’s first soliloquy he reveals bits of his plans, and motives behind them. Iago confesses that he plans to destroy Othello â€Å" but for my sport and profit. I hate the Moor†. Declaring his hate for Othello his plots against him for fun and for his own personal gain. He later gives the excuse that Othello may have slept with his wife Emilia â€Å"and it is thought abroad that ’twixt my sheets h’as done my office†, but this seems hard to believe because it doesn’t seem to bother him all that much. He doesn’t even bother to find out if this claim is even true or not. This is where we really get to see Iago’s ingenious, he decides to kill to birds with one stone â€Å"In double knavery† his victims are Othello and Cassio. He states that he will plant seeds ofShow MoreRelatedWhat Do Iagos Two Soliloquies Tell Us (the Audience) About His Motives and Character?680 Words   |  3 PagesIagos intentions and motives for the malicious and evil acts he performs can be fully realized when he reads his soliloquies to the audience. It gives Iago the chance to be completely honest for once and provides the irony when the audience knows Iagos plans but the other characters are unaware and call him ‘Honest Iago. In Iagos soliloquy in Act 1 Scene 3, Iago exclaims I hate the Moor; he repeats this sentence many times during the first act of the play. The reasons for his hatred areRead MoreOthello By William Shakespeare s Othello Essay1230 Words   |  5 Pages Previously, in Act 3.4, Othello begins to suspect Desdemona’s loyalty, as he continuously asks Desdemona for the handkerchief, yet she keeps on changing the topic. In Act 4.1, Iago continues to convince Othello of Desdemona’s faithfulness. In Act 3.4, Othello defended Desdemona when Iago accused her; but in Act 4.1, their position is switched. Othello becomes more aware of what Iago is saying and the anger that he has towards Iago has significantly reduced, while he begins to doubt Desdemona.Read MoreIagos Soliloquy Analysis Essay1704 Words   |  7 Pages Soliloquies play a vital role in William Shakespeare’s works. One of the most important examples of soliloquy use by a character was provided by Iago throughou t the play, Othello. A soliloquy is side speech given by a character that is directed to the audience; it most often used to reveal emotions or thoughts of a character in a play. Iago’s use of soliloquies are very unique and stand out from any other character. They constantly change the audiences opinion of him. Each of Iago’s eleven soliloquiesRead MoreOthello Character Analysis1678 Words   |  7 Pagesmasterpieces and tragedies such as Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth, King Lear and Romeo and Juliet caused a remarkable turning point in English literature as whole, and English drama in particular.His play Othellois one of his unforgettable tragedies. The play of Othello is the finest example of Shakespeare’s poetic and narrative style. Thus, Shakespeare is known as the most influential dramatist whose tragedies found the way to interact with the audience.Shakespeare’s Othello is about jealousy, revenge and deceptionRead MoreHow Does Shakespeare Use Language an d Dramatic Devices to Present the Theme of Jealousy in Othello?1497 Words   |  6 PagesHow does Shakespeare use language and dramatic devices to present the theme of jealousy in Othello? ----- Othello weaves a tragic tale of love, jealousy and murder. Set in Venice and progressing to Cyprus, Shakespeare’s Othello follows the cursed path of its namesake, a black soldier whose love for his wife ultimately results in her death. Woven into the socially and emotionally delicate plot is a multitude of key themes, including race (Othello’s colour), love, and jealousy. A key figure, if notRead MoreAnalysis of Act One of Othello by William Shakespeare Essay1474 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of Act One of Othello by William Shakespeare Act 1 is an exceptionally indicative passage of writing in which Shakespeare attempts to divulge the coarse essence of Iagos nature to the audience. Indeed, by the conclusion of line 66 the audience not only understands - in broad terms - Iagos motives and grievances, but also something of the manner in which he intends to consummate Read MoreIagos Soliloquies in Wiliam Shakespeares Othello Essay471 Words   |  2 PagesIagos Soliloquies in Wiliam Shakespeares Othello Through soliloquies in the play, Iago shares his plans and thoughts with the audience. Its through this method that the audience discovers his intentions and motives for his actions. Until the third act there are 3 soliloquies and in each one he shares his thoughts and lets the audience some where into his mind. Critics have suggested that through this confidence he shares with the audience, they become his accomplicesRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Othello And The Existence Of Power1110 Words   |  5 PagesShakespeare displays the presence of power in his work of Othello wielded by his mastermind of a character, Iago. Throughout Shakespeare’s play, the existence of power results in a tragedy for the characters of Othello. The play involves themes of jealousy, racism, hate and judgment that all relate to one having power over others. Knowing that Cassio had been promoted to the rank of lieutenant over Iago himself, he seeks to exact revenge on Othello for overlooking his capabilities to be promoted andRead MoreIago in Shakespeares Othello Essay1381 Words   |  6 PagesShakespeares Othello is a remarkable tale of trust, deceitfulness, lust and the most destructive of human emotions: vengeance and hatred. Iago better known as Othellos antagonist embodies vengeance and hatred to move an agenda to squash all who oppose Iagos plans. As defined by Merrium-Webster the definition of a protagonist is a principal character in a literary work or a leading actor, character, or participant in a literary work. Othello by Shakespeare is a play about Othello an example ofRead MoreShakespeare Movie vs Play712 Words   |  3 PagesShakespeares Othello: Movie (Oliver parker 1995) Vs. Play Oliver parkers Othello came out in 1995 with Laurence Fishburne as Othello this is also the first time Othello was played by a coloured actor, Kenneth Branagh as Iago and Irene Jacob as Desdemona. Parker kept the original plot and language intact, however the movie seemed to give Othello life through visual and audio aids. Parkers Othello enables the viewer to associate on a personal level and compliments to the anticipation and imagination

U.s. President s National Policy - 844 Words

Public approval has always been an essential part of the American Presidency. But times have changed and today U.S. Presidents make public appearances to make sure that the public approval rating of them is favorable. These public appearances allow the president to show off positive characteristics like integrity and courage which makes the President likeable to the American people. The president’s public displays to the American people has essentially turned him into a spectacle. The change of the Presidential image into to a public spectacle is being used by modern presidents as a propaganda tool that helps them to implement each U.S. president’s national policy. One of the best examples of the Presidential spectacle being used as a propaganda tool was during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Reagan was elected into office at a time when the preceding President, Jimmy Carter, received disapproval from the American public because he was perceived as weak due to his mishandling of the Iranian hostage crisis. Reagan used Jimmy Carter’s poor approval rating to his advantage and was able to portray himself as a strong masculine leader to the public. The media showed images to the public of Reagan riding horses and exercising, which defined him as a spectacle who was a strong militant leader. Reagan’s image as a strong leader helped him to achieve public approval for military intervention in Grenada. Grenada was a socialist state in the Caribbean and the Reagan administrationShow MoreRelatedThe United States And The Civil Rights Movement903 Words   |  4 PagesBeginning in the 1960’s the growing strength of the civil rights mo vement struck the attention of political figures that influenced calls to reform the U.S. immigration policy. In the 1920’s immigration was based on the national-origins quota system. The system assigned each nationality a quota, which restricted immigration on the basis of existing proportions of the population due to its representation in past U.S. census figures. The goal of the quota system was to maintain the existing ethnicRead MoreU.s. Foreign Policy Policies1370 Words   |  6 PagesThe U.S. foreign policy has always been linked to the domestic policy since the U.S. never feared of expanding its national interests over the national boarders. Isolation for the U.S. usually implied slow economic growth and the large number of destructive conflicts within, while impudent foreign policy always guaranteed an abrupt economic growth for the U.S. economy. After the U.S. intervened in the WWI and the WWII, the U.S. economy witnessed a tremendous economic growth, nearly elimin ation ofRead MoreThe Doctrine Of The United States1392 Words   |  6 Pagescable by U.S. diplomat George F. Kennan. As an outline of U.S. policy, the word originated during a report Kennan submitted to U.S. Defense Secretary James Forrestal in 1947, a report that was later utilized in a article. To describe Western policy toward the country within the Twenties. The word containment is associated most powerfully with the policies of U.S. President Harry S Truman (1945–53).First lets excogitate regarding the most purpose which is that the USA Containment Policy, ContainmentRead MoreThe Foundation Of The U.s. National Security Policy1077 Words   |  5 Pagesfoundation of the U.S. National Security Policy is on the Goldwater-Nichols Act. 1947, signed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan after the World War II, encouraging a restructure of the military through the National Security Act of 1947. The Department of War and the Department of Navy was unified into the National Military Establishment (NME), then renamed to Department of Defense with the purpose to have Army, Navy and Air Force into a unified structure. President Truman signed the National Security ActRead MoreThe American Political System Is Defined As A Constitutional Democracy1228 Words   |  5 Pagesthe country. The President is a head of executive branch, who offers bills to the Congress, enforces federal laws, controls foreign policy, serves as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and with the approval of the Senate, makes treaties and appoints secretaries (ministers). President can veto a bill unless Congress by a two-thirds vote shall overrule it. The Constitution of the USA is the central instrument of American government and the supreme law of the land. The president s relationship withRead MoreU.S. Bombing of North Vietnam1454 Words   |  6 PagesOn February 24, 1965, United States President Lyndon B. Johnson authorized Operation ROLLING THUNDER to commence against North Vietnam. ROLLING THUNDER, the longest bombing campaign ever conducted by the United States Air Force, lasted from 1965 to 1968. (Tilford, â€Å"Operation ROLLING THUNDER†) There were several reasons why President Johnson chose to begin an all-out bombing campaign against North Vietnam at this time. The United States wanted to prevent the spread of communism by enforcing theRead More Political History of Global Warming Essay1101 Words   |  5 Pagescredit a single event that encouraged the U.S. Government to begin a major program to investigate global climate change; instead it would best be explained as a long series of events, mostly in response to the international attention given it. The idea that excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could trap heat in Earths atmosphere was first put forward in 1898 by Swedish physicist Svante Arrhenius. But it wasnt until the late 50s that scientists within U.S. federal agencies started to participateRead MoreThe United States Foreign Pol icy1667 Words   |  7 PagesForeign Policy Analyst, the following memo will address three areas of the United States’ foreign policy. The U.S. has gone through may transition when it comes to its foreign policy. The United States has been an isolationist, neutralist, and internationalist country from the year it was founded to now. The executive branch and the president apply their power to influence and change the nation’s foreign policy. There are specific departments within the Executive Office of the President (EOP) createdRead MoreThe United States Has Engaged In Numerous International1349 Words   |  6 Pagesevents that have shaped the politics of U.S. foreign policy, Israel, and the Arab states are the Suez Crisis of 1956 and the Six Day War of 1967. President Eisenhower and President Johnson each took different approaches while confronting these crises. The personalities, motives and predispositions of the Presidents and their circle of closest advisors exp lain how they shaped their policies and how they responded to the events. The decisions these Presidents made have had a long-lasting effect on theRead MoreThe Reagan Tax Cuts and Foreign Policy1442 Words   |  6 PagesThe Reagan Tax Cuts and Foreign Policy During the 1980s President Ronald Reagans (our 40th president from 1981 to 1989) domestic policy of a substantial tax cut led to greatly increased economic prosperity for our country. During Reagans administration marked changes were made to the tax code and economic statistics showed a major change for the better. However, at the same time, the Democrats controlled the Congress and continued increased spending against Reagans wishes. The Joint Economic

Separation of Power free essay sample

In this essay I shall attempt to analyse whether the separation of powers is respected in the attribution of competences within the European Union. The separation of powers In order to assess this question we first have to consider what the doctrine of separation of powers actually is. The idea was developed by the French jurist Montesquieu in the 18th Century. It is based on a division of power between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Each institution have their distinct and largely exclusive domain. The legislative function involves the enactment of general rules determining the structure and powers of public authorities and regulating the conduct of citizens and private organisations. The executive’s main function is to carry out the law. It initiates legislation, maintains order, promotes social and economic welfare, administrates public services and conducts external relations of the state among other things. The primary judicial function is to determine disputed questions of fact and law in accordance with the law laid down by the legislature. The concept of â€Å"separation† may mean at least three different things: (i)that the same persons should not form part of more than one of the three organs of government, e. g. , that ministers should not sit in Parliament; (ii)that one organ of government should not control or interfere in judicial decisions; (iii)that one organ of government should not exercise the functions of another, e. g. , that ministers should not have legislative powers. The reason why there should be a separation of powers is so that each distinct institution can carry out its function independently and check the other two – a form of checks and balances. The doctrine is opposed to the concentration of state power in a single person or group, since that is a clear threat to democratic government and in the same sense it is important that the legislature is not only a rubber stamp for the executive. Even an independent judiciary is necessary if the rule of law is to have any substance. It is in the US’ constitution that this doctrine can best be seen. How then does the division of power look like within the European Union? The ain institutions within the Union are the Council of the EU (also known as the Council of Ministers), the European Commission, the European Parliament (the EP) and the European Court of Justice (the ECJ). In deep contrast to the doctrine of separation of powers, there is no independent legislature or executive within the EU. Almost all of the institutions are interrelated and there is no clear separation of competences. Only the judiciary (the ECJ) is more or less separated from the other institutions rega rding its judiciary powers. The Legislature In the EU, the legislative power is shared between the Council of EU and the European Parliament. The Council is the EU’s main decision-making institution and final legislative authority. However, it shares competence with the EP in respect to the legislative power. For a wide range of Community issues it exercises its legislative power in co-decision with the Parliament. The role of the Council as the main decision-making institution in the EU is defined in terms of three pillars set out in the Treaty of Maastricht. The first pillar covers a wide range of policies such as agriculture, environment, transport, energy and development. The Council may either adopt, amend or ignore the proposed law. However, a wide range of legislation is subject to a co-decision procedure. Depending on the individual legal basis, the EP takes part, to varying degrees, in the drafting of Community legislation. The role of the EP as co-legislator applies to a wide range of issues 39 legal bases in the EC Treaty. The co-decision procedure means that legislation has to be adopted by both the Council and the Parliament. This is a clear example of the mixture of competences that exists within the EU. For the two other pillars the Council is the sole decision-maker. Instead there is a consultation procedure, which requires consultation from the EP before the Council can adopt a legislative proposal. The Council is not required to accept the amendments listed in the opinion of the EP. The Council and the Parliament also constitute the budgetary authority adopting the Community’s budget and overseeing its implementation. The Executive Executive power in the EU is shared between the European Commission and the Council of EU. The Commission plays a major role in the EU’s policy-making process as EU laws are mainly enforced by Commission action. One of the distinct functions of the Commission is initiating proposals for legislation. The Commission is the main institution preparing proposals. However, concerning common foreign and security policy and co-operation on justice and home affairs, the Council is the promoter of initiatives and also the institution implementing the policies. But the Commission may submit a proposal. The Commission has also the budgetary initiative, drawing up the preliminary draft budget, which is put to the Council. Even the Parliament has a right of initiative. It has the possibility of asking the Commission to put forward a proposal and it is also involved in the budgetary procedure from the preparation stage, particularly in laying down the general guidelines and the type of spending. This is completely against the doctrine of separation of powers. Within this principle it is unthinkable that the same institution that is legislating is also the same body drafting the proposals for legislation. The Commission is also a negotiator of international trade and co-operation agreements with third countries, or groups of countries, which are put to the Council for conclusion. In an ordinary legal system, both the negotiating and the concluding of international agreements would be made by the executive, which would then have to be presented to the legislature. In the EU, in some cases, the Council cannot even conclude the agreements by itself, but has to consult the Parliament or even have its assent before being able to do so. The Judiciary The only function that has remained more or less distinct within the EU is the judicial function. The judiciary comprises of the European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance. The Court of Justice is responsible for enhancing the effectiveness of EU law and integration. Its two main functions are to directly apply the law and a general responsibility for interpreting the provisions of the European Treaty. However, even here there is to some extent a mixture of power. The reason for this lies with the Commission, which is quasi-judicial. Under certain circumstances, the Commission can fine individuals, firms and organisations for infringing Treaty law. But its decisions can be appealed. The ECJ can be consulted by the Member States and enterprises when they want to appeal against fines imposed by the Commission. Checks and balances Even though the system of the institutions of the EU is not compatible with the doctrine of the separation of powers the most important function of the doctrine still exists – institutional balance. Despite the mixture of the allocation of powers, there still remains a form of â€Å"checks and balances†. Commission proposals, actions and decisions are in various ways scrutinised, checked and judged by the other institutions. For instance, the Commission is answerable to the EP, which has the power to dismiss it by vote of censure or no confidence. The Commission attends all the sessions of the EP and must explain and justify its policies if so requested by members of the house and it must reply to written or oral questions put by the MEPs. The Commission’s management of the EU budget is also scrutinised by the Court of Auditors which is responsible for examining the legality and regularity of revenue and expenditure and for ensuring the sound financial management of the EU budget. On the basis of the Court of Auditors’ reports, it is the EP which gives the final discharge for the execution of the annual budget. The EP also exercises control over the Council; its representatives appearing regularly before the Parliament. Conclusion It can clearly be seen that the doctrine of separation of powers is not respected in the attribution of competences within the EU. However, complete separation of powers is possible neither in theory nor in practice, if by this is meant that each function is exercised in isolation from the others. Even in the US there is no complete separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial functions. In fact, even Montesquieu did not mean that legislature and executive should not have any influence over the acts of each other, but only that neither should exercise the whole power of the other. Instead it can be argued that what is more important is that there is an elaborate system of checks and balances to enable control and influence to be exercised by each branch upon the others. The best example of this is the UK, where there is no clear separation of powers, but where we instead have a developed form of checks and balances to ensure that no arbitrary decisions are taken. Although it can be argued whether the checks and balances that exist in the EU is as effective and elaborate as the ones in the US and the UK. In conclusion, the separation of powers is not respected in the attribution of competences within the EU. However, the lack of a clear, threefold allocation of functions is not necessary as long as there is an effective form of checks and balances.

Was their love/death fate Essay Example

Was their love/death fate? Essay Romeo and Juliet were set for hard times of struggle during their love, as is shown in the very first sentences of the play: From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, where civil blood makes civil hands unclean. Peoples views on the ending to Romeo and Juliets love affair varies from people saying it was fate that they should have so many obstacles, to get past them all and then end up dying with each other because love was impossible, to others saying it was merely a coincidence. The definition of fate is: The supposed force, principle, or power that predetermines events. We will write a custom essay sample on Was their love/death fate? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Was their love/death fate? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Was their love/death fate? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This means that no matter what you do to overcome obstacles, fate will still intercept and you cant decide what happens. You may think you have a choice, but fate will do as it wishes. This is some peoples view in Romeo and Juliet, and if I go by that particular definition, then I agree with that. As the story starts, Romeo is in love with the beautiful Rosaline, but she in turn does not love him back. This makes his best friend Mercutio and his cousin Benvolio even more determined to make him find someone that can love him in return. Nay, gentle Romeo, we must have you dance. You are a lover; borrow Cupids wings and soar with them above a common bound. This is the first clue that it is fate that will lead Romeo to death if he had not fallen for a woman that did not love him back, and his friends be so eager to set him up with someone, he would not have gone to the party and would not have fallen in love with someone he had to sneak around with to be with. When Romeo first spots Juliet, he sees her straight away as the most beautiful creature hes ever seen, and declares his love for her to himself. Beauty too rich for use, for earth too dear! Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight for I neer saw true beauty till this night. The most unfortunate part of the first act happens here, as Tybalt, Juliet Capulets cousin, notices that Romeo is in fact a Montague, and is about to start a fight with him, when Sir Capulet intervenes, and when finds out that Romeo is a Montague, actually seems to not be bothered, and says that there is nothing wrong with him. Content thee, gentle coz, let him alone; he bears him like a portly gentleman and, to say truth, Verona brags of him to be a virtuous and well-governd youth. If this was Sir Capulets view on Romeo, then if Romeo and Juliet had told him the news of their love, they may have been allowed to continue with their love affair without having to die because of it. This shows that it was fate that intervened because they didnt see any of this happen, therefore couldnt make it so they could be together. When Juliet, after meeting Romeo for the first time and immediately falling in love with him, is pulled away by the nurse to see her mother, the urgent meeting is about Paris, a very well-known and rich man. Her mother insists that the two of them would pair perfectly, and that now Juliet could marry a good and proper man. Romeo at the time is, too, horrified he realises that Juliet is a Capulet, the only family that he must avoid due to a long-standing family feud. Is she a Capulet? O dear account! My life is my foes debt. The line that Ive emblazoned in bold is a big clue that he will die for his foe, i.e. the family Capulet. Juliet is a Capulet, and he dies for her his life is a debt for Juliet. I think from then on, it is so pure and they are so in love so quickly, that it really is due to fate that all this is happening. I dont think that alone two teenagers could fall in love within a space of a few hours, so fate has something to do with their relationship. When Juliet and Romeo meet up at the balcony, Romeo proclaims after being told that if he is found he would be killed, My life were better ended by their hate, than death prorogued, wanting of thy love. In a way, the hate of the Capulets against the Montagues is fate. They have been loathing each other because of a long-held family feud; the ancestors that are actually alive at the time have no recollection of what the feud was actually about. Their hate seems to be controlled by fate, because if they forgave and forgot, Romeo and Juliet could be together. After Romeo and Juliet have married, Tybalt threatens to kill Romeo for his appearance at the Capulet mansion the night before. As Mercutio and Tybalt fight, Romeo is desperate to keep peace, but when Mercutio is stabbed, Romeo is delivered scalding words from his best friend. A plague o both your houses! They have made worms meat of me: I have it, and soundly too: your houses! Mercutio has almost told them of their fate that they, like him, will be worm meat. After Romeo and Juliet consecrate their marriage, Juliet almost foresees their fate in the future when she asks, O thinkst thou we shall ever meet again? And when Romeo replies that there is no doubt about it, she replies, O God, I have an ill-divining soul! Methinks I see thee, now thou art below, as one dead in the bottom of a tomb: Either my eyesight fails, or thou lookst pale. This is like Juliets final goodbye; this is the last time she sees him alive before she takes the sleeping-dead draught that Friar Lawrence gives her. She has told him what is to happen to him, but as they know nothing of their fate, they cannot change their plans. If Romeo had seen Friar Lawrence once more before leaving, he couldve saved himself and Juliet. When Juliet is forced to marry Paris, she goes to the Friar Lawrence for help. He gives her the draught, and tells her hell send a messenger to Romeo so he does not hear the news and do anything stupid. Relieved, she takes the draught and is seen to be dead the next morning. The messenger does not get to Romeo, as he is not allowed entry to Mantua due to diseases. Because of this, Romeo doesnt get the message sent by Friar Lawrence telling him that Juliet is not dead at all, but waiting to re-awaken and to be with Romeo once more. He is told by a friend that she is dead, and plans to kill himself by her side. When he arrives, she is close to awakening, but he does not realise; he takes the poison he purchased from the apothecary and dies beside her. When Juliet awakens, she sees her love dead below her, and looks at the poison vial. When she sees that he did not leave any for her, she takes his sword and impales herself with it, the two star-crossed lovers dying together. The play ends with Prince saying, Where be these enemies? Capulet! Montague! See, what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love. And I for winking at your discords too Have lost a brace of kinsmen: all are punishd. He proclaims that it is the fault of their parents for hating each other for no reason, and blames himself for shutting an eye to their constant arguments. Because of their carelessness, they have lost their children, two that were happy in each others company, and being torn apart by the family drove them to insanity. The whole play is based on love, and what fate can do to intercept between two lovers. I think that fate played the most important part in the play, and that had fate not been playing a part, the two star-crossed lovers would have been together happily, overcoming any obstacles thrown their way by coincidence.